Land Intelligence Report
Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301
6 ha · 8.3951, -83.2879 · A plan would change this land's answer.
The reading in full
This 6-hectare parcel near Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301 is workable land whose plan must come before the capital. It scores 54 out of 100 on the Dear Wise Earth Land Score.
The risks that most shape a decision here: The rainfall archive shows an unusually steep drying signal — verify before relying on it. A swing this large more often reflects a data artifact or measurement change than real climate; water planning should wait on local records rather than build on this number. This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050. Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones. This ground has a recorded seismic history. Repeated strong earthquakes within reach shape how anything here should be built — seismic design codes, slope stability under shaking, and insurance all follow from it.
Where the upside lies: Most of the parcel reads as tree cover. Tree cover can carry real conservation and carbon value, but satellite land-cover cannot tell natural forest from a monoculture plantation (oil palm, rubber, teak). Confirm which it is before assuming biodiversity or carbon value. A watercourse lies close to the parcel. Nearby surface water improves access to irrigation and supply and adds habitat value, though rights and distance still affect how usable it is.
The wider readings: Rainfall is very high. Abundant water supports productive growth but raises the risk of flooding, waterlogging, and nutrient leaching, so drainage and slope matter. The land is gently rolling. Gentle terrain is generally workable with only minor grading for buildings or roads. Biodiversity records are moderate. There is a reasonable but incomplete picture of local wildlife; a ground survey would sharpen any conservation or regulatory assessment. Soil organic carbon is moderate. The soil is workable but will benefit from cover cropping and organic inputs to build fertility before intensive use. Road and town access are close. Good access lowers development and logistics costs but can raise encroachment pressure and land prices. The human fabric around this land is measured, not assumed. Labour, emergencies, schooling, and electricity all run on these distances — they decide what daily life and operations here actually cost. Jurisdiction is part of the parcel. Permits, zoning, water, and roads run through these offices — knowing who governs the land is the first step of every plan that touches it. Official Costa Rican record places this in Puerto Jiménez, Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas. National cadastral and administrative data ground the parcel in the legal record — the basis for title, permitting, and tax diligence.
What the land is telling us: The land reads as holding rather than actively regenerating: the standing cover is intact, but the water or vegetation signal is under strain, so the trajectory turns on how the coming dry years are managed. Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot. Taken together, this is workable land whose plan must come before the capital. Its clearest strength to build from is that most of the parcel reads as tree cover.
The verdict
A plan would change this land's answer.
Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301
Frontier tier · 54 conservation priority
Five readings
Weakest: Climate
All five read on one axis: higher is better. Pressure scores calm, so a high number means little human pressure on this land.
Standing
Not yet ranked — the wall is still too small for a fair cohort. It sharpens as readings land.
Coverage
21 of 28 layers answered
Every pillar read from live data.
Silent: Sentinel-2, the radar, the governance record +4.
Where the capital goes
Frontierhospitality fit 61
Best-fit model
Corridor anchor reserve
Fit from published rules over the indicators.
The land in numbers
Headline figures. The Why tab carries each reading in full, with its source and its date. “Not read” means the source had nothing for this parcel: a gap is named, never filled with a guess.
How this land works
About 4,506 mm of rain falls here in a year. 100% of the parcel is under tree cover, and the ground slopes 5.6° on average, enough to move water without tearing soil where roots hold it. 6 mapped watercourses cross the land (Río Sombrerillo, Quebrada Sambos). A road runs against the boundary, which is the pressure the edge lives with. By 2050 the models expect +1.3 °C and +47% rain, so every flow above runs a little differently than it does today.
Holding — the canopy has held while the rain record fell -39.5%.
Protect the keystone; hold the connection open. With 100% tree cover beside the network and a conservation priority of 54, the leverage here is protection: secure the core so the connection it anchors stays open. To help: keep the canopy whole; the loop is running the right way on its own.
The score is the footnote. What matters is the pattern above it: what arrives, what the ground does with it, what leaves, and which way that is moving.
This place
6 hectares at Puerto Jiménez of gentle land around 153 m. The ground reads 100% under canopy. Water shapes it — 4,506 mm of rain a year, 6 traced watercourses. Sparsely peopled — 283 neighbours within 5 km, governed from Puerto Jiménez.
Protect the keystone; hold the connection open. With 100% tree cover beside the network and a conservation priority of 54, the leverage here is protection: secure the core so the connection it anchors stays open.
This is an outsider's reading, assembled from instruments and public records. It is where understanding begins, not where it ends — the land, its neighbours, and the people who know it hold the rest.
The parcel from orbit
Finding the latest clear satellite pass…
Reading the land's record…
The people around it
“Not read” means nothing of that kind is mapped within the search radius. That is a gap in the map, not a zero.
Who governs this land
Costa Rica · Puntarenas · Puerto Jiménez
What the land is exposed to — and what stands against it
The hazard screen did not answer for this parcel, so no reading is paired here — the adaptation layer alone is shown below the seismic record.
103 earthquakes of magnitude 5 or more within 100 km in 50 years, strongest M7.1 — most recent M5.5, 2025 (USGS).
What the record remembers
The named places and features the public encyclopedia holds around this land: the recorded memory, not the whole memory.
- Cabo Matapalo1.8 km
- Osa Mixed Wildlife Refuge6 km
No heritage features recorded within 10 km of this parcel.
Locations are deliberately withheld; presence is shown at landscape scale only. Costa Rica: archaeological finds are state property (Ley 6703); the Museo Nacional keeps the site registry and development projects carry a SETENA assessment duty. Absence of information here is not evidence of absence.
Relationships
A parcel is a node in living systems, not an island. Each line below is derived from this reading itself.
Each line is tagged with how it is known: estimated, from a model, not a measurement · observed, measured from satellite or map data · official, from a public or state record.
- estimated
This parcel collects the water of Its watershed— screening hydrography (MERIT-Hydro ~90 m)
- observed
This parcel is within reach of Río Sombrerillonearest mapped water 0.49 km
- observed
This parcel is within reach of Quebrada Sambos
- official
This parcel sits beside Corredor Biológico Osa9.4 km away— PNCB screening extent — confirm against SINAC
- official
Corredor Biológico Osa is designed to connect Parque Nacional Corcovado— PNCB screening extent — confirm against SINAC
- official
Corredor Biológico Osa is designed to connect Parque Nacional Piedras Blancas— PNCB screening extent — confirm against SINAC
- official
This parcel answers to Puerto JiménezHDI 0.74 (2022)
- official
Puerto Jiménez sits in Puntarenas
- official
Puntarenas sits in Costa Rica
- official
This parcel stands on ground that has felt Seismic history103 quakes ≥ M5 within 100 km in 50 yr
Where it sits
A living system does not stop at the fence. The parcel is a node in each of these, and it plays a different part at each scale.
- 1
parcel
6 ha inside the boundary
a standing block of forest
100% tree cover
- 2
corridor
Corredor Biológico Osa
core of the corridor
9.4 km to the corridor
The threads
Where the readings connect. Each thread follows one chain of cause and consequence across the instruments, and ends in what it means for what you do.
Each line is tagged with how it is known: recorded, from the historical archive · observed, measured from satellite or map data · estimated, from a model, not a measurement · derived, reasoned from other readings on this page · official, from a public or state record · scientific, from a published study.
The forest here has held for a generation.
- recordedThis canopy has held: 96% cover in 2000, 0% lost since, none of it recent.
What to doThe work here is keeping, not fixing — and the first walk should confirm the stand is as intact up close as it reads from orbit.
Bears on the land's living value · high confidence
The water here is thinning.
- observedThe twenty-year rain record moved -39.5% — this is a place whose water is changing, not holding.
- estimatedDry spells head toward ~24 days by 2050 — water security, storage, and drought-tolerant planting become the design constraints here.
- derivedNote the disagreement: the observed archive moved -39.5%, while the 2050 model says +47%. Neither cancels the other — the archive is what happened, the model is one projection. Design for the envelope: storage for the dry record, drainage for the wet projection.
What to doPrice water storage into any plan and verify the dry-season sources on the ground.
Bears on any plan that needs water · medium confidence
Abundant water is also a legal shape on this land.
- observed6 watercourses are traced on and around this parcel.
- officialCosta Rica's Ley Forestal 7575 (art. 33) protects riparian strips — roughly 10–15 m along rivers in rural land, up to 50 m on steep banks and around springs.
- derivedMultiply the strips by the watercourses and a material share of the parcel is likely untouchable by law — which is a constraint for building and a gift for conservation.
What to doMap the statutory buffer zones before pricing or siting anything — the buildable area is smaller than the deed.
Bears on how much of the land is actually usable · medium confidence
This is self-reliance country.
- scientific283 people live within 5 km — this is a place with few neighbours.
- derivedThe nearest hospital or clinic is 16 km away — emergencies, energy, and every delivery run on that distance.
- derivedRemote land is cheaper to buy and more expensive to run: generator or solar, first-aid capability, and labor that must travel become line items.
What to doBudget the remoteness honestly (energy, medical response, transport) before it surprises you.
Bears on daily life and operating cost · medium confidence
The loops that govern it
Regeneration is not a feature added to land; it is a loop changing direction. These are the ones the readings can see, which way each is running, and where a hand changes it.
Forest and water
canopy → cloud and rain held → streams and soil moisture → canopy
holding
100% tree cover on 4,506 mm of rain; 0% of the tree cover lost since 2000.
Keep the canopy whole; the loop is running the right way on its own.
The edge and the road
access → clearing at the edge → more edge → more access
holding
road 0.4 km; 0% tree cover lost since 2000.
Decide what the road is for before anything else: a gate, a planted edge and a written access rule are the cheapest interventions on this land.
Reading the place
This 6-hectare parcel near Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301 is workable land whose plan must come before the capital, scoring 54 out of 100. The reading that most shapes the work here is that the rainfall archive shows an unusually steep drying signal — verify before relying on it. Its main strength is that most of the parcel reads as tree cover. The first move: build a water budget sized to the projected dry spell, not the annual average.
The rainfall archive shows an unusually steep drying signal — verify before relying on it.
A swing this large more often reflects a data artifact or measurement change than real climate; water planning should wait on local records rather than build on this number.
The archive's linear trend reads about 39% lower over 20 years (2004–2024) — outside the range the engine treats as dependable.
This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050.
Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones.
Projected change by 2050: +1.3 °C mean temperature, +47% rainfall. Exposure rated High.
This ground has a recorded seismic history.
Repeated strong earthquakes within reach shape how anything here should be built — seismic design codes, slope stability under shaking, and insurance all follow from it.
103 earthquakes ≥ M5 within 100 km in 50 years, strongest M7.1, most recent M5.5 in 2025 (USGS catalog).
Most of the parcel reads as tree cover.
Tree cover can carry real conservation and carbon value, but satellite land-cover cannot tell natural forest from a monoculture plantation (oil palm, rubber, teak). Confirm which it is before assuming biodiversity or carbon value.
100% of the parcel reads as tree cover (satellite land-cover mapping). Naturalness is not verified.
A watercourse lies close to the parcel.
Nearby surface water improves access to irrigation and supply and adds habitat value, though rights and distance still affect how usable it is.
Nearest mapped watercourse is about 0.49 km away (Río Sombrerillo).
Rainfall is very high.
Abundant water supports productive growth but raises the risk of flooding, waterlogging, and nutrient leaching, so drainage and slope matter.
4,506 mm of rain per year. Nearest mapped watercourse is about 0.49 km away.
The land is gently rolling.
Gentle terrain is generally workable with only minor grading for buildings or roads.
Mean elevation 153 m, mean slope 6°, 45 m of relief.
Biodiversity records are moderate.
There is a reasonable but incomplete picture of local wildlife; a ground survey would sharpen any conservation or regulatory assessment.
97 biodiversity records nearby, including Caracara plancus and Cathartes aura (GBIF, the global species-record archive).
Soil organic carbon is moderate.
The soil is workable but will benefit from cover cropping and organic inputs to build fertility before intensive use.
29 g/kg soil organic carbon in the top 30 cm, clay loam texture, pH 5.4 (ISRIC SoilGrids).
Road and town access are close.
Good access lowers development and logistics costs but can raise encroachment pressure and land prices.
About 0.35 km to the nearest road.
The human fabric around this land is measured, not assumed.
Labour, emergencies, schooling, and electricity all run on these distances — they decide what daily life and operations here actually cost.
283 people live within 5 km (WorldPop 2020); nearest hospital or clinic 16 km (Clínica CCSS Puerto Jiménez); school 1.6 km; airstrip 15.7 km.
Jurisdiction is part of the parcel.
Permits, zoning, water, and roads run through these offices — knowing who governs the land is the first step of every plan that touches it.
Costa Rica · Puntarenas · Puerto Jiménez — canton HDI 0.74 (2022, PNUD/UCR), 8,789 people in the governing unit.
Official Costa Rican record places this in Puerto Jiménez, Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas.
National cadastral and administrative data ground the parcel in the legal record — the basis for title, permitting, and tax diligence.
Jurisdiction: Puerto Jiménez, Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas. Source: SNIT.
Confidence reflects the data behind each reading: high when clear passes or strong sources agree, medium on a partial or single-source signal, low where the data is sparse or indirect. A low-confidence reading usually needs one more clear pass, or a check on the ground.
What the land is telling us
The land reads as holding rather than actively regenerating: the standing cover is intact, but the water or vegetation signal is under strain, so the trajectory turns on how the coming dry years are managed.
Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot.
Taken together, this is workable land whose plan must come before the capital. Its clearest strength to build from is that most of the parcel reads as tree cover.
Where the capital goes · corridor & deployment
Standalone conservation value, outside the mapped network.
standalone value, outside the mapped network
Two lenses, two numbers: the Land Score reads this land's own body; conservation priority reads its position in the network. When they disagree, the gap itself is the finding.
Nearest declared corridor: Corredor Biológico Osa, about 9 km · Área de Conservación Osa (ACOSA)
This reads as intact habitat to secure, scoring 54 out of 100 for conservation priority. It carries standalone value outside the mapped network — worth holding on its own terms. A small, low-footprint operation (fit 61/100) could fund the work from the already-worked ground.
The funding layer: a small, low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground, sized to carry the restoration — never spending the habitat it depends on.
The nearest declared corridor is the Corredor Biológico Osa, about 9 km away (screening).
The parcel reads as outside the mapped network, so its connectivity value comes from what it holds and what protected land sits beside it rather than a corridor mandate. That corridor links Parque Nacional Corcovado, Parque Nacional Piedras Blancas, Humedal Térraba-Sierpe.
Nearest PNCB screening extent ~9 km. Extents are approximate — confirm against SINAC/PNCB.
This reads as intact habitat — the priority is to secure it, not rebuild it.
Standing natural forest is far cheaper to protect than to restore, and holding it inside a corridor keeps the connection open. Securing tenure and legal protection is where capital does the most here.
100% tree cover.
A small hospitality operation could carry the conservation here.
In the regenerative model the lodging is a means, not the end: a low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that funds the restoration and stewardship, while the core is left to recover. Kept small, it also gives the corridor local guardians with a reason to hold it.
Hospitality fit 61/100, drawing on standing forest. Site any building on the already-worked ground, not the habitat.
Capital moves
- 01
Secure this land first — through purchase, or a conservation easement that survives a change of owner.
Before committingIntact corridor habitat holds its value only while it stays intact; locking in protection before the land turns over is the move capital cannot undo.
Confirm on the ground · Confirm title and boundaries with a local lawyer, then scope a servidumbre ecológica (ecological easement) and FONAFIFO's PSA forest-protection payment (Pago por Servicios Ambientales — Costa Rica's national payment for keeping forest standing) against the parcel.
- 02
Protect the standing forest and remove the active threats to it.
First visitThe habitat is already here; the work is to keep it — stopping clearing, fire, and hunting pressure holds far more value than any planting would add.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the boundary for signs of encroachment, fire, and hunting; agree the protection terms with neighbours who share the edge.
- 03
Site a small, low-footprint hospitality operation on the already-worked ground to fund the stewardship.
Once the land is securedA modest operation on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that pays for the restoration and the guardians, without spending the habitat it depends on.
Confirm on the ground · Model the operation at a size the land can carry, keep it off the habitat, and check the Certificado de Sostenibilidad Turística (CST) and local zoning before designing anything.
- 04
Set a connectivity baseline and re-read it — camera traps aimed at the movement the corridor was declared to carry.
OngoingFunders and partners judge a corridor by whether wildlife actually moves through it; a repeatable baseline is what turns the thesis into evidence and steers the next round of capital.
Confirm on the ground · Run camera traps and species counts on a fixed schedule, aimed at the connectivity this corridor was declared for — the peninsular corridor holding Corcovado's lowland rainforest in contact with Piedras Blancas across the Osa.
The deployment reading is a screening lens layered on the Land Score — it points capital at the land where it builds the most connectivity, and each move is paired with the ground-truth step that confirms it. Corridor extents are approximate PNCB screening footprints; confirm a parcel against the official SINAC/PNCB record.
The physical frame
Climate, water, soil, and shape — what the land is made of and what moves across it.
Climate · to 2050
Annual rainfall, 2004–2024 · mm
Exposure · High
2050 sits within a single planning horizon — about 24 years out. The models expect seasons here about 1.3°C warmer than today's, with 47% more rain. Expect is the honest verb: this is the middle of a range of futures, not a certainty — so design to the range, not to today.
Water
Río Sombrerillo · Quebrada Sambos · Quebrada · Quebrada Carbonera
Soil · 0–30 cm
Clay loam
Terrain & cover
The living surface
What grows here, what is being lost, and what presses on it.
Ecology
Caracara plancus · Cathartes aura · Coragyps atratus · Columbina talpacoti
Pressure
Forest history · since 2000
Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2023-v1.11
Record & context
What the state and its institutions say about this ground.
Costa Rica ecological corridor
Corredor Biológico Osa
The peninsular corridor holding Corcovado's lowland rainforest in contact with Piedras Blancas across the Osa.
Connects · Parque Nacional Corcovado · Parque Nacional Piedras Blancas · Humedal Térraba-Sierpe
PNCB / SINAC — Corredores Biológicos (screening reference) · approximate screening extent — confirm against the official SINAC / PNCB record
See the corridor network →Costa Rica land record
SNIT Costa Rica (IGN / IDECORI) · official national data — verify title & permits locally
Regional illness · dengue
Puerto Jiménez district (recorded under Golfito in this window) · nationally, Costa Rica recorded 31,259 dengue notifications in 2024.
OpenDengue (PAHO / Ministerio de Salud record) · notification counts (suspected + probable + confirmed (non-severe & severe)), not population-adjusted — historical burden geography, not the current season. Ground-truth with the Ministerio de Salud's weekly bulletin.
Future · the horizons the engine has read
Now
- Mean temperature
- 25.3 °C
- Rain, latest year (2024)
- 4,651 mm
- Hot days (≥32 °C) / yr
- 0
- Longest dry spell
- 7 days
- Mean elevation
- 153 m
The rain row is one year alone — the Water panel's 4,506 mm is the long mean, and with the record down 39% in twenty years, recent years sit below it by design.
2050
- Temperature shift
- +1.3 °C+1.3 to +1.4 °C across 4 models
- Rainfall shift
- +47 %+11 to +47 % across 4 models
- Hot days (≥32 °C) / yr
- 19 (+19)
- Longest dry spell
- 24 days (+17)
- Exposure
- High — a hard projected shift — plan around it
- Resilience reading
- 10 / 100
The resilience reading is the climate pillar from the five dials above — one number, shown here beside the horizon it scores.
The headline projection is one model family (CMIP6 · MPI-ESM1-2-XR via Open-Meteo); the range beside it spans 4 CMIP6 HighResMIP models. All of them run one emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5) — several models, not several futures. The 2045–2049 window stands in for 2050, and expect is the honest word. Intermediate horizons (2030 · 2040) and 2100 are not shown because the engine has not read them — TERRA does not interpolate between measurements.
Best-fit regenerative model
Corridor anchor reserve
51 / 100 fitProtect the keystone; hold the connection open.
With 100% tree cover beside the network and a conservation priority of 54, the leverage here is protection: secure the core so the connection it anchors stays open.
High-value habitat inside the connectivity network. The move is to secure it — purchase or easement — so the corridor it anchors stays unbroken.
Also consider · Watershed protection (46) · Ecolodge / retreat (40)
A published, rules-based suggestion read from the parcel's own indicators — forest, water, slope, access, and its place in the network. It names the shape of project the land is already set up to carry; confirm it against tenure, soils, and what you know from the ground. These fit numbers rank whole project models against each other; the deployment lens's hospitality fit (61/100) is a different scale that asks only whether a small lodge could fund the stewardship here — the two need not match.
What to do
- 01
Build a water budget sized to the projected dry spell, not the annual average.
First dry seasonWater, not the yearly total, is the limiting factor here; storage and drought-tolerant choices decide what the land can carry.
Confirm on the ground · Measure the springs, wells, and watercourses at the end of the dry season, when supply is at its lowest — that is the number to plan against.
- 02
Design to the 2050 climate projections rather than today's conditions.
First yearThe land is strongly exposed to projected change, so species, water storage, and infrastructure should be chosen for the conditions ahead.
Confirm on the ground · Cross-check the projections against the memory of long-time residents on how the seasons have already shifted here.
- 03
Ground-truth what the canopy actually is before assuming forest value.
First visitSatellite land-cover cannot separate natural forest from a monoculture plantation, and the difference decides the conservation and carbon value.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the stand: one species in rows is plantation; mixed ages and species with natural regeneration is forest. A botanist can confirm.
- 04
Confirm soil and water on the ground, then design to what the land can carry.
First visitThe land is workable, but the plan has to be built to its limits rather than around a hoped-for use.
Confirm on the ground · Ground-truth the key constraints before committing to a use, then size the plan to them.
Questions to sit with
- At the end of the dry season, where does water still hold on this land — and what would keep it there a month longer?
- Standing under the canopy, is it one species or many — and which parts would you protect rather than replant?
- Are you here to hold this land as it is, to work it, or to help it change — and does the reading above serve that intention?
- If the work succeeds, what do the water, the canopy, and the people around this land look like a generation from now — and what is the first condition that has to change for that to begin?
- Where does this reading disagree with what you have seen walking the land? That disagreement is the first thing to check on the ground.
These are not data gaps — they are the questions the data cannot answer.
Ask the analyst
Answers are grounded in this parcel's reading and tagged by basis — observed is measured, derived is reasoned from measurements, estimated is model-based, and unknown is said plainly. The conversation stays in your browser.
Talk it through with us
This reading is built from satellite and open data. It cannot see soil biology, legal tenure, or what you already know from walking the land — a 30-minute call tests the reading against the ground and sequences the work. No cost, no obligation.
Sources & method · 21 layers→
Overpass (waterways, highways, places, protected areas)
Occurrence records (count + top species)
Nearest hospital, school, fuel, airport, port, power grid
Nearest fire station, emergency post, flood/coastal defence, water works, monitoring station, coastline — mapped presence, not effectiveness
Recorded historic/heritage features within 10 km — generalized to counts, classes and distance bands; never coordinates
Named places and features of the surrounding landscape (titles + distances)
Administrative units, cadastral parcels, agrological land-capability, protected areas, Holdridge life zones (WFS)
Declared biological corridors (bundled screening reference of official corridors; approximate extents — confirm against SINAC/PNCB)
Dengue notifications by cantón 2013–2018 (suspected + probable + confirmed) + national series to 2024; bundled OpenDengue V1.3 extract — historical burden geography, not the current season
Nominatim reverse geocode
Terrarium elevation tiles
Archive 2004–2024 + MPI-ESM1-2-XR to 2050
SoilGrids v2.0 (SOC, pH, sand, clay; 0–30 cm)
WorldCover 2021 v200
Global Surface Water v1.4 — occurrence & seasonality
Global Forest Change (tree cover 2000 + annual loss)
Upstream basin + downstream flowpath (screening hydrography)
Gridded population 2020 (parcel + 5 km ring sums)
M ≥ 5 events within 100 km, past 50 years
Administrative hierarchy + structured facts of the governing unit
Official decree-delimited territory boundaries (legal-constraint overlay; never scored or ranked)
Every number above is public, open data — named, dated, and licensed. What TERRA does not publish is the lens: the weights, curves, and verdict thresholds that turn these layers into a Land Score. That judgment is calibrated from land walked on the ground, and it stays proprietary.
Unavailable for this parcel: Sentinel-2, the radar, the governance record, the thermal read, the underground atlas, the hazard screen, modis fire history — the affected pillars were reweighted, not guessed.
Generated Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:14:16 GMT · 18.4s · synthesized by TERRA.
Generated Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:14:16 GMT · synthesized by TERRA · Dear Wise Earth.