Public reading

Export full report →Open on the board →Read another →

Shaded-relief view of the land around Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste, the parcel boundary drawn in gold

100 ha inside the gold line

500 m

Shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles

Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste

100 ha · 10.527, -85.747 · Costa Rica

63out of 100 · Land ScoreRestore

Real upside, waiting on the work.

60th percentile for like land · Frontier tier · 38 conservation priority

Water: 100
Soil: 60
Ecology: 56
Climate: 21
Pressure: 69

9 of 13 sources answered · higher is better on every pillar; pressure reads calm · silent: sentinel2_ndvi, sentinel1_rtc, worldbank_wgi…

The reading in full

This 100-hectare parcel near Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste is land with sound foundations and clear regenerative upside. It scores 63 out of 100 on the Dear Wise Earth Land Score.

The risks that most shape a decision here: About 5% of the parcel is permanently under water. This area cannot be built on or farmed without major drainage or fill work, so it reduces the usable land and the cost of developing it. Dry spells are projected to run about 76 days by 2050. A long rain-free stretch — not the yearly total — is what empties soil moisture and storage; size water storage and choose drought-tolerant planting to the dry spell, not the annual average. This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050. Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones. A meaningful share of this land's tree cover has been cleared since 2000. Long-term loss points to historical or ongoing clearing pressure and a lower conservation baseline; confirm the legal status and whether clearing is still active.

The wider readings: The land is projected to see roughly 122 hot days a year by 2050. Many days above 32 °C stress crops, livestock, workers, and unshaded ground; favour heat-tolerant species, shade, and water retention, and plan for cooling and storage. Rainfall is high and supports rain-fed use. There is enough water for most crops and forestry with little or no irrigation; dry-season storage still helps. The land is gently rolling. Gentle terrain is generally workable with only minor grading for buildings or roads. The area has a rich record of documented wildlife. High biodiversity adds conservation value, may bring species-protection rules, and can support eco-tourism or habitat-credit programs. Soil organic carbon is moderate. The soil is workable but will benefit from cover cropping and organic inputs to build fertility before intensive use. The parcel is relatively remote. Distance from roads and towns means lower encroachment pressure and more privacy, but higher transport and operating costs.

What the land is telling us: The longer record suggests a land that has been drawn down rather than held: about 12% of its tree cover has been cleared since 2000, most recently in 2019. The cover is measurably coming back now — a land recovering, which is a workable base, but the history is the reason the foundational work comes first. Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls and community dynamics look rich, with a deep record of documented life nearby. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot. Taken together, this is land with sound foundations and clear regenerative upside.

The ground and its cover

Terrain · shaded relief — Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste — Terrain · shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles

Land cover · ESA WorldCover 2021 — Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste — Land cover · ESA WorldCover 2021 · ESA / Copernicus

The verdict, the five pillar readings, how much of the land was read, and the headline figures.

The verdict

63out of 100 · Land ScoreRestore

Real upside, waiting on the work.

Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste

ReclaimCultivateRestoreAnchor

60th percentile for like land · Frontier tier · 38 conservation priority

Five readings

Water100

Soil60

Ecology56

Climate21

Pressure69

Weakest: Climate

All five read on one axis: higher is better. Pressure scores calm, so a high number means little human pressure on this land.

Standing

60thpercentile

Tropical humid · Neotropic · against 26 readings · 61st of all 100

Coverage

100%

weight read

9 of 13 layers answered

Every pillar read from live data.

Silent: Sentinel-2, the radar, the governance record +1.

Where the capital goes

38/ 100 priority

Frontierhospitality fit 63

Best-fit model

Coastal buffer · blue–green

58 / 100

Fit from published rules over the indicators.

The land in numbers

Area

100ha

Elevation

29m

1–137 m

Slope

4.0°

Buildable bench

not read

Forest cover

59%

Canopy height

not read

Rainfall

2,023mm/yr

+57% over 20 yr

Warming to 2050

+1.3°C

rain -25%

Soil carbon

31.4g/kg

pH 6.4

Nearest road

3.6km

Species records

6,174records

GBIF, the global species archive

Headline figures. The Why tab carries each reading in full, with its source and its date. “Not read” means the source had nothing for this parcel: a gap is named, never filled with a guess.

How this land works

About 2,023 mm of rain falls here in a year. 59% of the parcel is under tree cover, and the ground is nearly flat (4° on average), so water lingers rather than runs. 4 mapped watercourses cross the land (Río Sardinal, Quebrada San Francisco). The nearest road is 3.6 km off, which is the pressure the edge lives with. By 2050 the models expect +1.3 °C and -25% rain, so every flow above runs a little differently than it does today.

Holding — 11.9% of the tree cover lost since 2000; rainfall up 57% over twenty years.

To help: stop the clearing at the streams first: every metre of canopy kept along water holds the loop together.

The score is the footnote. What matters is the pattern above it: what arrives, what the ground does with it, what leaves, and which way that is moving.

This place

100 hectares at Sardinal of rolling land around 29 m. The ground reads 59% under canopy, 10% built. Water shapes it — 2,023 mm of rain a year, 4 traced watercourses.

Its vocationbuffer

Protect the blue–green edge. Low-lying at 29 m, this reads as a coastal or wetland edge — an inference from elevation and water signals, not a measured shoreline distance, so confirm how near the water actually is. If it holds, the play is the buffer: protect and restore it for blue carbon (the carbon coastal wetlands lock away), storm defence, and nursery habitat.

29 m elevation59% forest4.0° slope2,023 mm rain/yrFrontier tier — outside the mapped network

Its trajectoryrecovering— cut after 2000, the cover is returning.

This is an outsider's reading, assembled from instruments and public records. It is where understanding begins, not where it ends — the land, its neighbours, and the people who know it hold the rest.

The threads

Where the readings connect. Each thread follows one chain of cause and consequence across the instruments, and ends in what it means for what you do.

Each line is tagged with how it is known: recorded, from the historical archive · observed, measured from satellite or map data · estimated, from a model, not a measurement · derived, reasoned from other readings on this page · official, from a public or state record.

This is a forest coming back, not one that never left.

recordedCut and coming back: 11.9% went after 2000 (last in 2019), and the cover now reads 59% — the land is regrowing, which means young forest, not old.

What to doProtect the regrowth's momentum: young forest gains value fastest when simply left connected and unburned.

Bears on the land's living value · high confidence

More water is arriving — and arriving harder.

observedThe twenty-year rain record moved +57.3% — this is a place whose water is changing, not holding.
estimatedThe dry spells are lengthening at the same time (~69 → ~76 days) — more rain is arriving in stronger pulses with longer gaps, not as a gentler year.
derivedNote the disagreement: the observed archive moved +57.3%, while the 2050 model says -25%. Neither cancels the other — the archive is what happened, the model is one projection. Design for the envelope: drainage for the wet record, storage for the dry projection.

What to doKeep or restore cover on the slopes and size drainage for pulses, not averages; verify culverts and crossings in the wet season.

Bears on this land and the people downstream · medium confidence

Abundant water is also a legal shape on this land.

observed4 watercourses are traced on and around this parcel.
officialCosta Rica's Ley Forestal 7575 (art. 33) protects riparian strips — roughly 10–15 m along rivers in rural land, up to 50 m on steep banks and around springs.
derivedMultiply the strips by the watercourses and a material share of the parcel is likely untouchable by law — which is a constraint for building and a gift for conservation.

What to doMap the statutory buffer zones before pricing or siting anything — the buildable area is smaller than the deed.

Bears on how much of the land is actually usable · medium confidence

Strong land, standing on its own.

derivedThe Land Score reads 63 against a conservation priority of 38.
derivedIts value is intrinsic rather than positional — the network does not depend on it, which frees what it can be.

What to doPlans here answer to the land itself, not to a network obligation.

Bears on what a plan owes the landscape · medium confidence

Heat is the trend to plan against here.

estimatedHot days head from ~91 to ~122 a year by 2050.
derivedThat reshapes what can be farmed, when work happens outdoors, and what shade and water infrastructure cost.

What to doShade, water, and heat-tolerant species are not upgrades here — they are the baseline design.

Bears on any plan with people or crops outdoors · medium confidence

The loops that govern it

Regeneration is not a feature added to land; it is a loop changing direction. These are the ones the readings can see, which way each is running, and where a hand changes it.

Forest and water

canopy → cloud and rain held → streams and soil moisture → canopy

running toward degradation

59% tree cover on 2,023 mm of rain; 11.9% of the tree cover lost since 2000, last in 2019.

Stop the clearing at the streams first: every metre of canopy kept along water holds the loop together.

Open ground and soil

bare or grazed ground → compaction → runoff → thinner soil

holding

41% open ground on a 4° average slope.

Keep the ground covered through the dry season; rested pasture and cover crops turn this loop around on gentle slopes.

The edge and the road

access → clearing at the edge → more edge → more access

holding

road 3.6 km; 11.9% tree cover lost since 2000.

Distance is doing the work here; keep it, and do not build the road that would end it.

Reading the place

This 100-hectare parcel near Sardinal, Carrillo, Guanacaste is land with sound foundations and clear regenerative upside, scoring 63 out of 100. The reading that most shapes the work here is that about 5% of the parcel is permanently under water. The first move: map how water moves and stands across the parcel before siting anything on it.

Riskhigh confidence

About 5% of the parcel is permanently under water.

This area cannot be built on or farmed without major drainage or fill work, so it reduces the usable land and the cost of developing it.

5% permanent open water, plus 1% under seasonal water (JRC Global Surface Water, 1984–2021).

Riskmedium confidence

Dry spells are projected to run about 76 days by 2050.

A long rain-free stretch — not the yearly total — is what empties soil moisture and storage; size water storage and choose drought-tolerant planting to the dry spell, not the annual average.

Longest yearly run of days under 1 mm of rain projected near 76 days longer than today's 69-day spell (Open-Meteo daily climate).

Riskmedium confidence

This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050.

Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones.

Projected change by 2050: +1.3 °C mean temperature, -25% rainfall. Exposure rated High.

Riskhigh confidence

A meaningful share of this land's tree cover has been cleared since 2000.

Long-term loss points to historical or ongoing clearing pressure and a lower conservation baseline; confirm the legal status and whether clearing is still active.

About 11.9% of the parcel lost tree cover since 2000, most recently in 2019. It held 38% tree cover in 2000. Source: Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2023-v1.11.

Climatemedium confidence

The land is projected to see roughly 122 hot days a year by 2050.

Many days above 32 °C stress crops, livestock, workers, and unshaded ground; favour heat-tolerant species, shade, and water retention, and plan for cooling and storage.

About 122 days a year with a daily high of 32 °C or more by the 2050 horizon up from about 91 today (Open-Meteo daily climate).

Waterhigh confidence

Rainfall is high and supports rain-fed use.

There is enough water for most crops and forestry with little or no irrigation; dry-season storage still helps.

2,023 mm of rain per year. Nearest mapped watercourse is about 2.43 km away. The archive's 20-year trend reads about +57% — a swing that size deserves verification against local records before it informs any plan.

Terrainhigh confidence

The land is gently rolling.

Gentle terrain is generally workable with only minor grading for buildings or roads.

Mean elevation 29 m, mean slope 4°, 136 m of relief.

Biodiversityhigh confidence

The area has a rich record of documented wildlife.

High biodiversity adds conservation value, may bring species-protection rules, and can support eco-tourism or habitat-credit programs.

6,174 biodiversity records nearby, including Quiscalus mexicanus and Pitangus sulphuratus (GBIF, the global species-record archive).

Soilmedium confidence

Soil organic carbon is moderate.

The soil is workable but will benefit from cover cropping and organic inputs to build fertility before intensive use.

31.4 g/kg soil organic carbon in the top 30 cm, clay loam texture, pH 6.4 (ISRIC SoilGrids).

Accesshigh confidence

The parcel is relatively remote.

Distance from roads and towns means lower encroachment pressure and more privacy, but higher transport and operating costs.

About 3.58 km to the nearest road.

Confidence reflects the data behind each reading: high when clear passes or strong sources agree, medium on a partial or single-source signal, low where the data is sparse or indirect. A low-confidence reading usually needs one more clear pass, or a check on the ground.

What the land is telling us

The longer record suggests a land that has been drawn down rather than held: about 12% of its tree cover has been cleared since 2000, most recently in 2019. The cover is measurably coming back now — a land recovering, which is a workable base, but the history is the reason the foundational work comes first.

Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls and community dynamics look rich, with a deep record of documented life nearby. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot.

Taken together, this is land with sound foundations and clear regenerative upside.

Where the capital goes · corridor & deployment

38Conservation priority

FrontierStepping stone

Standalone conservation value, outside the mapped network.

standalone value, outside the mapped network

Two lenses, two numbers: the Land Score reads this land's own body; conservation priority reads its position in the network. When they disagree, the gap itself is the finding.

Nearest declared corridor: Corredor Biológico Rincón Cacao, about 32 km · Área de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG)

This reads as a partial patch that extends the network's reach, scoring 38 out of 100 for conservation priority. It carries standalone value outside the mapped network — worth holding on its own terms. A small, low-footprint operation (fit 63/100) could fund the work from the already-worked ground.

63/100

Hospitality fit

The funding layer: a small, low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground, sized to carry the restoration — never spending the habitat it depends on.

Corridorlow confidence

The nearest declared corridor is the Corredor Biológico Rincón Cacao, about 32 km away (screening).

The parcel reads as outside the mapped network, so its connectivity value comes from what it holds and what protected land sits beside it rather than a corridor mandate. That corridor links Parque Nacional Rincón de la Vieja, Parque Nacional Guanacaste (sector Cacao), Parque Nacional Santa Rosa.

Nearest PNCB screening extent ~32 km. Extents are approximate — confirm against SINAC/PNCB.

Conservationmedium confidence

This reads as a partial patch — enhancing it extends the network's reach.

A partly-forested parcel beside the corridor works as a stepping stone: thickening its cover and connecting it to the neighbours widens the habitat that species can actually move through.

59% tree cover, 12% cleared since 2000.

Hospitalitymedium confidence

A small hospitality operation could carry the conservation here.

In the regenerative model the lodging is a means, not the end: a low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that funds the restoration and stewardship, while the core is left to recover. Kept small, it also gives the corridor local guardians with a reason to hold it.

Hospitality fit 63/100, drawing on standing forest. Site any building on the already-worked ground, not the habitat.

Capital moves

01
Tie up the land before restoring it — purchase or an easement that holds through a sale.
Before committing
Restoration is a multi-year investment; without secure tenure the connectivity it builds can be undone by the next owner.
Confirm on the ground · Trace the title with a local lawyer and pull the cadastral record; check eligibility for FONAFIFO's PSA payment (Pago por Servicios Ambientales — Costa Rica pays landowners to keep or restore forest) for reforestation or regeneration on the parcel.
02
Thicken cover along the parcel's edges and watercourses to widen what species can move through.
First year
As a stepping stone or buffer, the parcel's contribution is its edges and riparian strips — the parts that link to the habitat next door.
Confirm on the ground · With an ecologist, identify the connecting strips worth planting first; confirm which watercourses cross the land at the end of the dry season.
03
Site a small, low-footprint hospitality operation on the already-worked ground to fund the stewardship.
Once the land is secured
A modest operation on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that pays for the restoration and the guardians, without spending the habitat it depends on.
Confirm on the ground · Model the operation at a size the land can carry, keep it off the habitat, and check the Certificado de Sostenibilidad Turística (CST) and local zoning before designing anything.
04
Set a connectivity baseline and re-read it — camera traps aimed at the movement the corridor was declared to carry.
Ongoing
Funders and partners judge a corridor by whether wildlife actually moves through it; a repeatable baseline is what turns the thesis into evidence and steers the next round of capital.
Confirm on the ground · Run camera traps and species counts on a fixed schedule, aimed at the connectivity this corridor was declared for — dry-forest connectivity binding Rincón de la Vieja to the Cacao volcano and the lowland forests of Santa Rosa, part of the sea-to-summit ACG.

The deployment reading is a screening lens layered on the Land Score — it points capital at the land where it builds the most connectivity, and each move is paired with the ground-truth step that confirms it. Corridor extents are approximate PNCB screening footprints; confirm a parcel against the official SINAC/PNCB record.

How it compares

60thpercentile · Tropical humid · Neotropic

Ranked against 26 readings · same bioclimate zone

61st percentile against all 100 readings so far — the cohort rank above is the fairer one; this is the wider one.

About typical for the 26 readings logged in Tropical humid · Neotropic. Ecology is its strongest signal here (81st percentile), development pressure its weakest (44th).

Percentile by reading · higher is better land

Water

65th

Soil

79th

Ecology

81st

Climate

44th

Low pressure

44th

Percentiles compare this reading against the growing corpus of public TERRA readings in like land — not all land on Earth. They sharpen as the wall grows.

The physical frame

Climate, water, soil, and shape — what the land is made of and what moves across it.

Climate · to 2050

Annual rainfall, 2004–2024 · mm

27.0°C

Mean temp

+1.3°C

2050 Δ temp

-25%

2050 Δ rain

Exposure · High

2050 sits within a single planning horizon — about 24 years out. The models expect seasons here about 1.3°C warmer than today's, with 25% less rain. Expect is the honest verb: this is the middle of a range of futures, not a certainty — so design to the range, not to today.

Water

2,023mm/yr

Rainfall

+57.3%

20-yr trend

2.4km

To watercourse

Permanent water

1% seasonal

Río Sardinal · Quebrada San Francisco · Quebrada Espavel

Soil · 0–30 cm

31.4g/kg

Org. carbon

6.4

35%

Sand

36%

Clay

Clay loam

Terrain & cover

29m

Elevation

4.0°

Mean slope

59%

Forest

10%

Built

Tree cover 59%Grassland 23%Built-up 10%Water 7%Bare / sparse 1%

The living surface

What grows here, what is being lost, and what presses on it.

Ecology

6,174

Recorded wildlife observations

GBIF · the global species-record archive

Quiscalus mexicanus · Pitangus sulphuratus · Zenaida asiatica · Calocitta formosa

Pressure

3.6km

To road

—km

To settlement

Forest history · since 2000

38%

Tree cover 2000

11.9%

Cover lost

2019

Latest loss

Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2023-v1.11

Record & context

What the state and its institutions say about this ground.

Costa Rica ecological corridor

Nearby

Corridor

~32 km away

Área de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG)

Conservation area

Corredor Biológico Rincón Cacao

Dry-forest connectivity binding Rincón de la Vieja to the Cacao volcano and the lowland forests of Santa Rosa, part of the sea-to-summit ACG.

Connects · Parque Nacional Rincón de la Vieja · Parque Nacional Guanacaste (sector Cacao) · Parque Nacional Santa Rosa

PNCB / SINAC — Corredores Biológicos (screening reference) · approximate screening extent — confirm against the official SINAC / PNCB record

See the corridor network →

Best-fit regenerative model

Coastal buffer · blue–green

58 / 100 fit

Protect the blue–green edge.

Low-lying at 29 m, this reads as a coastal or wetland edge — an inference from elevation and water signals, not a measured shoreline distance, so confirm how near the water actually is. If it holds, the play is the buffer: protect and restore it for blue carbon (the carbon coastal wetlands lock away), storm defence, and nursery habitat.

Low-lying coastal or wetland ground where mangrove, marsh, and dry forest meet the sea. Protect and restore the buffer — blue carbon, storm defence, nursery habitat.

29 m elevation59% forest4.0° slope2,023 mm rain/yrcorridor ~32 km

Also consider · Ecolodge / retreat (35) · Regenerative agroforestry estate (34)

A published, rules-based suggestion read from the parcel's own indicators — forest, water, slope, access, and its place in the network. It names the shape of project the land is already set up to carry; confirm it against tenure, soils, and what you know from the ground. These fit numbers rank whole project models against each other; the deployment lens's hospitality fit (63/100) is a different scale that asks only whether a small lodge could fund the stewardship here — the two need not match. Two theses share this ground: this lens reads its low wet edge — the buffer to restore; the deployment lens reads its standing patches — the stepping stones. One parcel holds both, so walk it to see which dominates, and let the first money follow that.

What to do

01
Map how water moves and stands across the parcel before siting anything on it.
First visit
A large share reads as standing or saturated ground, which sets what can be built, farmed, or drained, and where.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the low ground at the end of the wet season and after heavy rain; a hydrologist can confirm the drainage pattern.
02
Build a water budget sized to the projected dry spell, not the annual average.
First dry season
Water, not the yearly total, is the limiting factor here; storage and drought-tolerant choices decide what the land can carry.
Confirm on the ground · Measure the springs, wells, and watercourses at the end of the dry season, when supply is at its lowest — that is the number to plan against.
03
Design to the 2050 climate projections rather than today's conditions.
First year
The land is strongly exposed to projected change, so species, water storage, and infrastructure should be chosen for the conditions ahead.
Confirm on the ground · Cross-check the projections against the memory of long-time residents on how the seasons have already shifted here.
04
Walk the land to scope the regenerative work before committing capital.
First visit
The foundations are present and the upside is real, but sequencing the work well is what realises it.
Confirm on the ground · Read the water, soil, and cover on the ground, then plan the work from the most permanent layer down.

Questions to sit with

Which of the wet ground is a problem to drain, and which is an asset to keep — and who downstream depends on how you answer that?
If the seasons here shift as the models expect, which of your intentions for the land still hold — and which need rethinking now?
Are you here to hold this land as it is, to work it, or to help it change — and does the reading above serve that intention?
If the work succeeds, what do the water, the canopy, and the people around this land look like a generation from now — and what is the first condition that has to change for that to begin?
Where does this reading disagree with what you have seen walking the land? That disagreement is the first thing to check on the ground.

These are not data gaps — they are the questions the data cannot answer.

Ask the analyst

Answers are grounded in this parcel's reading and tagged by basis — observed is measured, derived is reasoned from measurements, estimated is model-based, and unknown is said plainly. The conversation stays in your browser.

Reading this land to

Talk it through with us

This reading is built from satellite and open data. It cannot see soil biology, legal tenure, or what you already know from walking the land — a 30-minute call tests the reading against the ground and sequences the work. No cost, no obligation.

Schedule a 30-min call →See services or email us

Sources & method · 9 layers→

Water, roads & protected areas — OpenStreetMap

Overpass (waterways, highways, places, protected areas)

vector · live

ODbL 1.0

Biodiversity — GBIF

Occurrence records (count + top species)

point · live

Mixed CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-NC (per dataset)

Place — OpenStreetMap / Nominatim

Nominatim reverse geocode

settlement · live

ODbL 1.0

Terrain — AWS Terrarium (Mapzen)

Terrarium elevation tiles

~10 m (z12) · 2017

Open (attribution)

Climate — Open-Meteo

Archive 2004–2024 + MPI-ESM1-2-XR to 2050

~9 km · 2004–2024 / 2045–2049

CC-BY 4.0 (data); non-commercial API tier

Soil — ISRIC SoilGrids v2

SoilGrids v2.0 (SOC, pH, sand, clay; 0–30 cm)

250 m · 2020

CC-BY 4.0

Land cover — ESA WorldCover

WorldCover 2021 v200

10 m · 2021

CC-BY 4.0 (commercial promotion: notify due@esa.int)

Surface water — JRC Global Surface Water

Global Surface Water v1.4 — occurrence & seasonality

30 m · 1984–2021

Copernicus / open (attribution)

Forest loss — Hansen Global Forest Change

Global Forest Change (tree cover 2000 + annual loss)

~30 m · 2000–2023

CC-BY 4.0

Every number above is public, open data — named, dated, and licensed. What TERRA does not publish is the lens: the weights, curves, and verdict thresholds that turn these layers into a Land Score. That judgment is calibrated from land walked on the ground, and it stays proprietary.

Unavailable for this parcel: Sentinel-2, the radar, the governance record, the thermal read — the affected pillars were reweighted, not guessed.

Generated Mon, 29 Jun 2026 22:23:03 GMT · 6.2s · synthesized by TERRA.