Public reading

Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301

1,355 ha · 8.394, -83.297 · Costa Rica

2.5 km

Shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles

The verdict

44/ 100 · Land ScoreCultivate

A plan would change this land's answer.

Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301

ReclaimCultivateRestoreAnchor

22nd percentile for like land · Frontier tier · 65 conservation priority

Five readings

Water8

Soil60

Ecology89

Climate10

Pressure67

weakest · Water

All five read on one axis — up is good. Pressure scores calm: a high number is little human pressure on this land.

Standing

22ndpercentile

Tropical · Neotropic · against 37 readings · 19th of all 85

Coverage

100%

weight read

12 of 16 layers answered

Every pillar read from live data.

Silent: Sentinel-2, the radar, the governance record +1.

Where the capital goes

65/ 100 priority

Frontierhospitality fit 77

Best-fit model

Ecolodge / retreat

61 / 100

Fit from published rules over the indicators.

The land in numbers

Area

1,355ha

Elevation

189m

22–333 m

Slope

4.8°

Forest cover

99%

Canopy height

not read

Rainfall

4,506mm/yr

-40% over 20 yr

Warming to 2050

+1.3°C

rain +47%

Soil carbon

32.5g/kg

pH 5.4

Nearest road

0.4km

Species records

79,692GBIF

Headline figures only. Every card below carries the full reading, its source and its date; a figure the engine did not read is named, never filled in.

This place

1,355 hectares at Puerto Jiménez of strongly rising land around 189 m. The ground reads 99% under canopy. Water shapes it — 4,506 mm of rain a year, 10 traced watercourses.

Its vocationinhabit carefully

Fund conservation through low-footprint hospitality. Accessible and scenic beside standing habitat, with a hospitality fit of 77/100, this land can carry a small, low-footprint operation whose revenue funds the conservation.

189 m elevation99% forest4.8° slope4,506 mm rain/yrFrontier tier — outside the mapped network

Its trajectoryholding, but drying— the canopy has held while the rain record fell -39.5%.

This is an outsider's reading, assembled from instruments and public records. It is where understanding begins, not where it ends — the land, its neighbours, and the people who know it hold the rest.

The threads

Where the readings connect. Each thread follows one chain of cause and consequence across the instruments — and ends in what it means for what you do.

The forest here has held for a generation.

recordedThis canopy has held: 91% cover in 2000, 0.7% lost since, none of it recent.

What to doThe work here is keeping, not fixing — and the first walk should confirm the stand is as intact up close as it reads from orbit.

Lands on: the land's living value · confidence high

The water here is thinning.

observedThe twenty-year rain record moved -39.5% — this is a place whose water is changing, not holding.
estimatedDry spells head toward ~24 days by 2050 — water security, storage, and drought-tolerant planting become the design constraints here.
derivedNote the disagreement: the observed archive moved -39.5%, while the 2050 model says +47%. Neither cancels the other — the archive is what happened, the model is one projection. Design for the envelope: storage for the dry record, drainage for the wet projection.

What to doPrice water storage into any plan and verify the dry-season sources on the ground.

Lands on: any plan that needs water · confidence medium

Abundant water is also a legal shape on this land.

observed10 watercourses are traced on and around this parcel.
officialCosta Rica's Ley Forestal 7575 (art. 33) protects riparian strips — roughly 10–15 m along rivers in rural land, up to 50 m on steep banks and around springs.
derivedMultiply the strips by the watercourses and a material share of the parcel is likely untouchable by law — which is a constraint for building and a gift for conservation.

What to doMap the statutory buffer zones before pricing or siting anything — the buildable area is smaller than the deed.

Lands on: how much of the land is actually usable · confidence medium

The network needs this land more than its own body suggests.

derivedThe Land Score reads 44, but conservation priority reads 65 — a 21-point gap.
officialIts position in the corridor network does work its standalone condition does not show.

What to doValue this land by what it connects, not only what it contains — the leverage is in its position.

Lands on: the corridor network · confidence medium

For its kind of land, its water is unusually weak.

derivedAgainst 37 readings of like land (Tropical · Neotropic), this parcel's water ranks in the bottom 4%.
derivedAn unusual weakness is rarely bad luck — something specific happened or is happening here that its peers escaped.

What to doMake water the first diligence question on the ground: find the cause before pricing the land.

Lands on: what this land is, relative to its kind · confidence medium

Reading the place

This 1,355-hectare parcel near Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas Province, 61301 is workable land whose plan must come before the capital, scoring 44 out of 100. The reading that most shapes the work here is that the rainfall archive shows an unusually steep drying signal — verify before relying on it. Its main strength is that most of the parcel reads as tree cover. The first move: build a water budget sized to the projected dry spell, not the annual average.

Risklow confidence

The rainfall archive shows an unusually steep drying signal — verify before relying on it.

A swing this large more often reflects a data artifact or measurement change than real climate; water planning should wait on local records rather than build on this number.

The archive's linear trend reads about 39% lower over 20 years (2004–2024) — outside the range the engine treats as dependable.

Riskhigh confidence

The terrain is steep, which constrains construction and raises erosion risk.

Steep slopes increase building and road costs, limit machinery access, and make the land more prone to erosion and landslides.

Mean slope 5°, with 311 m of elevation change across the parcel.

Riskmedium confidence

This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050.

Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones.

Projected change by 2050: +1.3 °C mean temperature, +46.6% rainfall. Exposure rated High.

Opportunitylow confidence

Most of the parcel reads as tree cover.

Tree cover can carry real conservation and carbon value, but satellite land-cover cannot tell natural forest from a monoculture plantation (oil palm, rubber, teak). Confirm which it is before assuming biodiversity or carbon value.

99% of the parcel reads as tree cover (satellite land-cover mapping). Naturalness is not verified.

Opportunityhigh confidence

A watercourse runs through the parcel.

On-site water supports irrigation, livestock, and habitat and can lower water-supply costs — though it may carry buffer or setback rules worth checking.

A mapped river or stream crosses the parcel (Río Piro).

Waterhigh confidence

Rainfall is very high.

Abundant water supports productive growth but raises the risk of flooding, waterlogging, and nutrient leaching, so drainage and slope matter.

4,506 mm of rain per year. A watercourse crosses the parcel.

Biodiversityhigh confidence

The area has a rich record of documented wildlife.

High biodiversity adds conservation value, may bring species-protection rules, and can support eco-tourism or habitat-credit programs.

79,692 biodiversity records nearby, including Ara macao and Ramphastos ambiguus (GBIF).

Soilmedium confidence

Soil organic carbon is moderate.

The soil is workable but will benefit from cover cropping and organic inputs to build fertility before intensive use.

32.5 g/kg soil organic carbon in the top 30 cm, clay loam texture, pH 5.4 (ISRIC SoilGrids).

Accesshigh confidence

Road and town access are close.

Good access lowers development and logistics costs but can raise encroachment pressure and land prices.

About 0.4 km to the nearest road.

Accessmedium confidence

Official Costa Rican record places this in Puerto Jiménez, Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas.

National cadastral and administrative data ground the parcel in the legal record — the basis for title, permitting, and tax diligence.

Jurisdiction: Puerto Jiménez, Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas. Source: SNIT.

Confidence reflects the data behind each reading: high when clear passes or strong sources agree, medium on a partial or single-source signal, low where the data is sparse or indirect. A low-confidence reading usually needs one more clear pass, or a check on the ground.

What the land is telling us

The land reads as holding rather than actively regenerating: the standing cover is intact, but the water or vegetation signal is under strain, so the trajectory turns on how the coming dry years are managed.

Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls and community dynamics look rich, with a deep record of documented life nearby. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot.

Taken together, this is workable land whose plan must come before the capital. Its clearest strength to build from is that most of the parcel reads as tree cover.

Where the capital goes · corridor & deployment

65Conservation priority

FrontierCore habitat

Standalone conservation value, outside the mapped network.

standalone value, outside the mapped network

Two lenses, two numbers: the Land Score reads this land's own body; conservation priority reads its position in the network. When they disagree, the gap itself is the finding.

Nearest declared corridor: Corredor Biológico Osa, about 10 km · Área de Conservación Osa (ACOSA)

This reads as intact habitat to secure, scoring 65 out of 100 for conservation priority. It carries standalone value outside the mapped network — worth holding on its own terms. A small, low-footprint operation (fit 77/100) could fund the work from the already-worked ground.

77/100

Hospitality fit

The funding layer: a small, low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground, sized to carry the restoration — never spending the habitat it depends on.

Corridorlow confidence

The nearest declared corridor is the Corredor Biológico Osa, about 10 km away (screening).

The parcel reads as outside the mapped network, so its connectivity value comes from what it holds and what protected land sits beside it rather than a corridor mandate. That corridor links Parque Nacional Corcovado, Parque Nacional Piedras Blancas, Humedal Térraba-Sierpe.

Nearest PNCB screening extent ~10 km. Extents are approximate — confirm against SINAC/PNCB.

Conservationmedium confidence

This reads as intact habitat — the priority is to secure it, not rebuild it.

Standing natural forest is far cheaper to protect than to restore, and holding it inside a corridor keeps the connection open. Securing tenure and legal protection is where capital does the most here.

99% tree cover.

Hospitalitymedium confidence

A small hospitality operation could carry the conservation here.

In the regenerative model the lodging is a means, not the end: a low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that funds the restoration and stewardship, while the core is left to recover. Kept small, it also gives the corridor local guardians with a reason to hold it.

Hospitality fit 77/100, drawing on standing forest, relief for views, water on site. Site any building on the disturbed matrix, not the habitat.

Capital moves

01
Secure this land first — through purchase, or a conservation easement that survives a change of owner.
Before committing
Intact corridor habitat holds its value only while it stays intact; locking in protection before the land turns over is the move capital cannot undo.
Confirm on the ground · Confirm title and boundaries with a local lawyer, then scope a servidumbre ecológica (ecological easement) and FONAFIFO's PSA forest-protection payment against the parcel.
02
Protect the standing forest and remove the active threats to it.
First visit
The habitat is already here; the work is to keep it — stopping clearing, fire, and hunting pressure holds far more value than any planting would add.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the boundary for signs of encroachment, fire, and hunting; agree the protection terms with neighbours who share the edge.
03
Site a small, low-footprint hospitality operation on the already-worked ground to fund the stewardship.
Once the land is secured
A modest operation on the disturbed matrix earns the revenue that pays for the restoration and the guardians, without spending the habitat it depends on.
Confirm on the ground · Model the operation at a size the land can carry, keep it off the habitat, and check the Certificado de Sostenibilidad Turística (CST) and local zoning before designing anything.
04
Set a connectivity baseline and re-read it — camera traps and the species the corridor was declared for.
Ongoing
Funders and partners judge a corridor by whether wildlife actually moves through it; a repeatable baseline is what turns the thesis into evidence and steers the next round of capital.
Confirm on the ground · Run camera traps and species counts on a fixed schedule — track the indicator species named for this corridor (The peninsular corridor holding Corcovado's lowland rainforest in contact with Piedras Blancas across the Osa).

The deployment reading is a screening lens layered on the Land Score — it points capital at the land where it builds the most connectivity, and each move is paired with the ground-truth step that confirms it. Corridor extents are approximate PNCB screening footprints; confirm a parcel against the official SINAC/PNCB record.

How it compares

22ndpercentile · Tropical · Neotropic

Ranked against 37 readings · same thermal belt

19th percentile against all 85 readings so far — the cohort rank above is the fairer one; this is the wider one.

Reads below most of the 37 readings logged in Tropical · Neotropic — stronger than 22%. Ecology is its strongest signal here (99th percentile), climate resilience its weakest (4th).

Percentile by reading · higher is better land

Water

4th

Soil

81st

Ecology

99th

Climate

4th

Low pressure

50th

Percentiles compare this reading against the growing corpus of public TERRA readings in like land — not all land on Earth. They sharpen as the wall grows.

The physical frame

Climate, water, soil, and shape — what the land is made of and what moves across it.

Climate · to 2050

Annual rainfall, 2004–2024 · mm

24.7°C

Mean temp

+1.3°C

2050 Δ temp

+47%

2050 Δ rain

Exposure · High

2050 sits within a single planning horizon — about 24 years out. The models expect seasons here about 1.3°C warmer than today's, with 47% more rain. Expect is the honest verb: this is the middle of a range of futures, not a certainty — so design to the range, not to today.

Water

4,506mm/yr

Rainfall

-39.5%

20-yr trend

On site

To watercourse

Permanent water

0% seasonal

Río Piro · Río Tamales · Río Sombrerillo · Quebrada Sambos

Soil · 0–30 cm

32.5g/kg

Org. carbon

5.4

35%

Sand

34%

Clay

Clay loam

Terrain & cover

189m

Elevation

4.8°

Mean slope

99%

Forest

Built

Tree cover 98%Grassland 1%Water 1%

The living surface

What grows here, what is being lost, and what presses on it.

Ecology

79,692

Recorded wildlife observations

GBIF · the global species-record archive

Ara macao · Ramphastos ambiguus · Coragyps atratus · Amazona autumnalis

Pressure

0.4km

To road

—km

To settlement

Forest history · since 2000

91%

Tree cover 2000

0.7%

Cover lost

2021

Latest loss

Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2023-v1.11

Record & context

What the state and its institutions say about this ground.

Costa Rica ecological corridor

Nearby

Corridor

~10 km away

Área de Conservación Osa (ACOSA)

Conservation area

Corredor Biológico Osa

The peninsular corridor holding Corcovado's lowland rainforest in contact with Piedras Blancas across the Osa.

Connects · Parque Nacional Corcovado · Parque Nacional Piedras Blancas · Humedal Térraba-Sierpe

PNCB / SINAC — Corredores Biológicos (screening reference) · approximate screening extent — confirm against the official SINAC / PNCB record

See the corridor network →

Costa Rica land record

Puerto Jiménez, Puerto Jiménez, Puntarenas

Jurisdiction

SNIT Costa Rica (IGN / IDECORI) · official national data — verify title & permits locally

Below the surface

The fungal networks that move water and nutrients between roots.

Underground fungal networks

Outside

Arbuscular fungi

partners of most crops & pastures

Outside

Ectomycorrhizal fungi

partners of much timber & forest

SPUN Underground Atlas (Van Nuland et al. 2025) · 1 km model of underground fungal biodiversity · hotspots = global top decile of predicted richness

Best-fit regenerative model

Ecolodge / retreat

61/100 fit

Fund conservation through low-footprint hospitality.

Accessible and scenic beside standing habitat, with a hospitality fit of 77/100, this land can carry a small, low-footprint operation whose revenue funds the conservation.

Accessible, scenic land beside standing habitat. A small, low-footprint operation on the worked ground earns the revenue that pays for the restoration.

189 m elevation99% forest4.8° slope4,506 mm rain/yrcorridor ~10 km

Also consider · Watershed protection (58) · Corridor anchor reserve (57)

A published, rules-based suggestion read from the parcel's own indicators — forest, water, slope, access, and its place in the network. It names the shape of project the land is already set up to carry; confirm it against tenure, soils, and what you know from the ground. These fit numbers rank whole project models against each other; the deployment lens's hospitality fit (77/100) is a different scale that asks only whether a small lodge could fund the stewardship here — the two need not match.

What to do

01
Build a water budget sized to the projected dry spell, not the annual average.
First dry season
Water, not the yearly total, is the limiting factor here; storage and drought-tolerant choices decide what the land can carry.
Confirm on the ground · Measure the springs, wells, and watercourses at the end of the dry season, when supply is at its lowest — that is the number to plan against.
02
Design roads and structures to the contour, and get a geotechnical and erosion assessment before any earthworks.
Before committing
Steep ground raises building and access costs and erosion risk; the terrain sets the layout, not the other way round.
Confirm on the ground · Have a geotechnical engineer assess slope stability and cut-and-fill on the ground before a road line is committed.
03
Design to the 2050 climate projections rather than today's conditions.
First year
The land is strongly exposed to projected change, so species, water storage, and infrastructure should be chosen for the conditions ahead.
Confirm on the ground · Cross-check the projections against the memory of long-time residents on how the seasons have already shifted here.
04
Ground-truth what the canopy actually is before assuming forest value.
First visit
Satellite land-cover cannot separate natural forest from a monoculture plantation, and the difference decides the conservation and carbon value.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the stand: one species in rows is plantation; mixed ages and species with natural regeneration is forest. A botanist can confirm.
05
Confirm soil and water on the ground, then design to what the land can carry.
First visit
The land is workable, but the plan has to be built to its limits rather than around a hoped-for use.
Confirm on the ground · Ground-truth the key constraints before committing to a use, then size the plan to them.

Questions to sit with

At the end of the dry season, where does water still hold on this land — and what would keep it there a month longer?
Standing under the canopy, is it one species or many — and which parts would you protect rather than replant?
Are you here to hold this land as it is, to work it, or to help it change — and does the reading above serve that intention?
If the work succeeds, what do the water, the canopy, and the people around this land look like a generation from now — and what is the first condition that has to change for that to begin?
Where does this reading disagree with what you have seen walking the land? That disagreement is the first thing to check on the ground.

These are not data gaps — they are the questions the data cannot answer.

Ask the analyst

Answers are grounded in this parcel's reading and tagged by basis — observed is measured, derived is reasoned from measurements, estimated is model-based, and unknown is said plainly. The conversation stays in your browser.

Reading this land to

Talk it through with Gregorio

This reading is built from satellite and open data. It cannot see soil biology, legal tenure, or what you already know from walking the land — a 30-minute call tests the reading against the ground and sequences the work. No cost, no obligation.

Schedule a 30-min call →See services or email Gregorio

Sources & method · 12 layers→

Water, roads & protected areas — OpenStreetMap

Overpass (waterways, highways, places, protected areas)

vector · live

ODbL 1.0

Biodiversity — GBIF

Occurrence records (count + top species)

point · live

Mixed CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-NC (per dataset)

Costa Rica territorial record — SNIT

Administrative units, cadastral parcels, agrological land-capability, protected areas, Holdridge life zones (WFS)

vector (1:5 000 base) · national SDI (rolling)

SNIT Condiciones Generales de Uso (attribution)

Ecological corridors — PNCB / SINAC (Costa Rica)

Declared biological corridors (bundled screening reference of official corridors; approximate extents — confirm against SINAC/PNCB)

screening extent · PNCB (rolling)

Public programme (SINAC); reference compiled for screening

Place — OpenStreetMap / Nominatim

Nominatim reverse geocode

settlement · live

ODbL 1.0

Terrain — AWS Terrarium (Mapzen)

Terrarium elevation tiles

~10 m (z12) · 2017

Open (attribution)

Climate — Open-Meteo

Archive 2004–2024 + MPI-ESM1-2-XR to 2050

~9 km · 2004–2024 / 2045–2049

CC-BY 4.0 (data); non-commercial API tier

Soil — ISRIC SoilGrids v2

SoilGrids v2.0 (SOC, pH, sand, clay; 0–30 cm)

250 m · 2020

CC-BY 4.0

Land cover — ESA WorldCover

WorldCover 2021 v200

10 m · 2021

CC-BY 4.0 (commercial promotion: notify due@esa.int)

Surface water — JRC Global Surface Water

Global Surface Water v1.4 — occurrence & seasonality

30 m · 1984–2021

Copernicus / open (attribution)

Forest loss — Hansen Global Forest Change

Global Forest Change (tree cover 2000 + annual loss)

~30 m · 2000–2023

CC-BY 4.0

Underground fungal networks — SPUN Underground Atlas

Top-decile hotspots of predicted AM + ECM fungal richness (Van Nuland et al. 2025, Nature; Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.14871588)

1 km · 2025 (v1.0)

No explicit license on the archive — terms requested from SPUN; attribution given

Every number above is public, open data — named, dated, and licensed. What TERRA does not publish is the lens: the weights, curves, and verdict thresholds that turn these layers into a Land Score. That judgment is calibrated from land walked on the ground, and it stays proprietary.

Unavailable for this parcel: Sentinel-2, the radar, the governance record, the thermal read — the affected pillars were reweighted, not guessed.

Generated Sun, 23 Aug 2026 05:47:38 GMT · 7.4s · synthesized by TERRA.