Public reading

Shaded-relief view of the land around Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Heredia Province, the parcel boundary drawn in gold100 ha inside the gold line
500 m
Shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles

Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Heredia Province

100 ha · 10.454, -84.008 · Costa Rica

57out of 100 · Land ScoreRestore

The capacity is present; the work is regeneration.

42nd percentile for like land · Corridor tier · 86 conservation priority

Water
100
Soil
not read
Ecology
49
Climate
59
Pressure
12

8 of 13 sources answered · higher is better on every pillar; pressure reads calm · silent: sentinel2_ndvi, sentinel1_rtc, soilgrids…

The reading in full

This 100-hectare parcel near Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Heredia Province is land with sound foundations and clear regenerative upside. It scores 57 out of 100 on the Dear Wise Earth Land Score.

The risks that most shape a decision here: This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050. Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones.

Where the upside lies: A watercourse runs through the parcel. On-site water supports irrigation, livestock, and habitat and can lower water-supply costs — though it may carry buffer or setback rules worth checking.

The wider readings: Rainfall is very high. Abundant water supports productive growth but raises the risk of flooding, waterlogging, and nutrient leaching, so drainage and slope matter. The land is flat. Flat ground is easy to build on, farm, and mechanize, though low flat land can drain poorly and should be checked for waterlogging. The area has a rich record of documented wildlife. High biodiversity adds conservation value, may bring species-protection rules, and can support eco-tourism or habitat-credit programs. No satellite soil data is available for this parcel. Soil quality cannot be assessed remotely here, so a ground survey is needed before any agricultural or restoration decision. Road and town access are close. Good access lowers development and logistics costs but can raise encroachment pressure and land prices.

What the land is telling us: Read across the record, the land reads as stable: the canopy history shows no meaningful loss in a generation and the water signal is holding, which means the work is to build on a sound base rather than to reverse a decline. Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls and community dynamics look rich, with a deep record of documented life nearby. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot. Taken together, this is land with sound foundations and clear regenerative upside. Its clearest strength to build from is that a watercourse runs through the parcel.

The ground and its cover

Terrain · shaded relief — Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Heredia Province
500 m
Terrain · shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles
Land cover · ESA WorldCover 2021 — Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Heredia Province
500 m
Land cover · ESA WorldCover 2021 · ESA / Copernicus

The verdict, the five pillar readings, how much of the land was read, and the headline figures.

The verdict

57out of 100 · Land ScoreRestore

The capacity is present; the work is regeneration.

Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Heredia Province

42nd percentile for like land · Corridor tier · 86 conservation priority

Four of five readings

Water100strong
Soilnot read
Ecology49fair
Climate59fair
Pressure12watch

Weakest: PressureNot read: Soil

All five read on one axis: higher is better. Pressure scores calm, so a high number means little human pressure on this land. The unread pillars had their weight redistributed across the rest — reweighted, never guessed.

Standing

42ndpercentile

Tropical humid · Neotropic · against 26 readings · 40th of all 100

Coverage

8 of 13 layers answered

Nearly complete — gaps reweighted, not guessed.

Silent: Sentinel-2, the radar, the soil survey +2.

Where the capital goes

86/ 100 priority

Corridorhospitality fit 63

Best-fit model

Coastal buffer · blue–green

52 / 100

Fit from published rules over the indicators.

The land in numbers

Area
100ha
Elevation
43m
36–55 m
Slope
1.5°
Buildable bench
not read
Forest cover
43%
Canopy height
not read
Rainfall
3,619mm/yr
-2% over 20 yr
Warming to 2050
+0.9°C
rain +14%
Soil carbon
not read
Nearest road
0.1km
Species records
37,677records
GBIF, the global species archive

Headline figures. The Why tab carries each reading in full, with its source and its date. “Not read” means the source had nothing for this parcel: a gap is named, never filled with a guess.

How this land works

About 3,619 mm of rain falls here in a year. 43% of the parcel is under tree cover, and the ground is nearly flat (1.5° on average), so water lingers rather than runs. 19 mapped watercourses cross the land (Rio Puerto Viejo, Quebrada Grande). A road runs against the boundary, and settlement sits within a kilometre, which is the pressure the edge lives with. By 2050 the models expect +0.9 °C and +14% rain, so every flow above runs a little differently than it does today.

Holding3.7% of the tree cover lost since 2000.

To help: plant along the watercourses and the ridge: canopy there returns the most water to the rest.

The score is the footnote. What matters is the pattern above it: what arrives, what the ground does with it, what leaves, and which way that is moving.

This place

100 hectares at Puerto Viejo of gentle land around 43 m. The ground reads 43% under canopy, 29% built. Water shapes it — 3,619 mm of rain a year, 19 traced watercourses. The nearest settlement is Puerto Viejo, 0 km away. It stands inside the Corredor Biológico San Juan–La Selva connectivity network (screening extent — confirm against SINAC, the national conservation agency).

Its vocationbuffer

Protect the blue–green edge. Low-lying at 43 m, this reads as a coastal or wetland edge — an inference from elevation and water signals, not a measured shoreline distance, so confirm how near the water actually is. If it holds, the play is the buffer: protect and restore it for blue carbon (the carbon coastal wetlands lock away), storm defence, and nursery habitat.

43 m elevation43% forest29% built1.5° slopeCorridor tier — restoration compounds here
Its trajectoryholdingthe canopy record shows no meaningful loss in a generation.

This is an outsider's reading, assembled from instruments and public records. It is where understanding begins, not where it ends — the land, its neighbours, and the people who know it hold the rest.

Sources & method · 8 layers
Water, roads & protected areas — OpenStreetMap

Overpass (waterways, highways, places, protected areas)

vector · live
ODbL 1.0
Biodiversity — GBIF

Occurrence records (count + top species)

point · live
Mixed CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-NC (per dataset)
Place — OpenStreetMap / Nominatim

Nominatim reverse geocode

settlement · live
ODbL 1.0
Terrain — AWS Terrarium (Mapzen)

Terrarium elevation tiles

~10 m (z12) · 2017
Open (attribution)
Climate — Open-Meteo

Archive 2004–2024 + MPI-ESM1-2-XR to 2050

~9 km · 2004–2024 / 2045–2049
CC-BY 4.0 (data); non-commercial API tier
Land cover — ESA WorldCover

WorldCover 2021 v200

10 m · 2021
CC-BY 4.0 (commercial promotion: notify due@esa.int)
Surface water — JRC Global Surface Water

Global Surface Water v1.4 — occurrence & seasonality

30 m · 1984–2021
Copernicus / open (attribution)
Forest loss — Hansen Global Forest Change

Global Forest Change (tree cover 2000 + annual loss)

~30 m · 2000–2023
CC-BY 4.0

Every number above is public, open data — named, dated, and licensed. What TERRA does not publish is the lens: the weights, curves, and verdict thresholds that turn these layers into a Land Score. That judgment is calibrated from land walked on the ground, and it stays proprietary.

Unavailable for this parcel: Sentinel-2, the radar, the soil survey, the governance record, the thermal read — the affected pillars were reweighted, not guessed.

Generated Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:41:55 GMT · 12.1s · synthesized by TERRA.