Public reading

Export full report →Open on the board →Read another →

Shaded-relief view of the land around San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province, the parcel boundary drawn in gold

52 ha inside the gold line

500 m

Shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles

San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province

52 ha · 9.698, -83.889 · Costa Rica

80out of 100 · Land ScoreAnchor

The soil carries this one.

95th percentile for like land · Keystone tier · 89 conservation priority

Water: 98
Soil: 100
Ecology: 57
Climate: 66
Pressure: 74

9 of 14 sources answered · higher is better on every pillar; pressure reads calm · silent: sentinel2_ndvi, sentinel1_rtc, snit_cr…

The reading in full

This 52-hectare parcel near San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province is ecologically strong land whose work is stewardship, not repair. It scores 80 out of 100 on the Dear Wise Earth Land Score.

Where the upside lies: The soil is rich in organic carbon, a strong base for farming and restoration. Carbon-rich soil holds water and nutrients well, supports higher yields and faster regrowth, and may qualify for soil-carbon programs. Most of the parcel reads as tree cover. Tree cover can carry real conservation and carbon value, but satellite land-cover cannot tell natural forest from a monoculture plantation (oil palm, rubber, teak). Confirm which it is before assuming biodiversity or carbon value.

The wider readings: Models project a warmer and drier climate here by 2050. Expect a warmer and drier future here; favour species and infrastructure that tolerate the projected range. Rainfall is very high. Abundant water supports productive growth but raises the risk of flooding, waterlogging, and nutrient leaching, so drainage and slope matter. Rainfall has also been rising, which can bring more intense wet seasons; plan drainage accordingly. The parcel sits at high elevation. Higher ground is cooler, which changes crop suitability and can ease heat stress, but may add access and frost considerations. Biodiversity records are moderate. There is a reasonable but incomplete picture of local wildlife; a ground survey would sharpen any conservation or regulatory assessment. The parcel is relatively remote. Distance from roads and towns means lower encroachment pressure and more privacy, but higher transport and operating costs.

What the land is telling us: Read across the record, the land reads as stable: the canopy history shows no meaningful loss in a generation and the water signal is holding, which means the work is to build on a sound base rather than to reverse a decline. Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot. Taken together, this is ecologically strong land whose work is stewardship, not repair. Its clearest strength to build from is that the soil is rich in organic carbon, a strong base for farming and restoration.

The ground and its cover

Terrain · shaded relief — San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province — Terrain · shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles

Land cover · ESA WorldCover 2021 — San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province — Land cover · ESA WorldCover 2021 · ESA / Copernicus

The verdict, the five pillar readings, how much of the land was read, and the headline figures.

The verdict

80out of 100 · Land ScoreAnchor

The soil carries this one.

San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province

ReclaimCultivateRestoreAnchor

95th percentile for like land · Keystone tier · 89 conservation priority

Five readings

Water98

Soil100

Ecology57

Climate66

Pressure74

Weakest: Ecology

All five read on one axis: higher is better. Pressure scores calm, so a high number means little human pressure on this land.

Standing

95thpercentile

Neotropic · against 93 readings · 95th of all 100

Coverage

100%

weight read

9 of 14 layers answered

Every pillar read from live data.

Silent: Sentinel-2, the radar, the national registry +2.

Where the capital goes

89/ 100 priority

Keystonehospitality fit 77

Best-fit model

Corridor anchor reserve

88 / 100

Fit from published rules over the indicators.

The land in numbers

Area

52ha

Elevation

2,410m

2,349–2,488 m

Slope

9.7°

Buildable bench

not read

Forest cover

82%

Canopy height

not read

Rainfall

3,703mm/yr

+18% over 20 yr

Warming to 2050

+1.6°C

rain -6%

Soil carbon

103.4g/kg

pH 5.1

Nearest road

1.6km

Species records

222records

GBIF, the global species archive

Headline figures. The Why tab carries each reading in full, with its source and its date. “Not read” means the source had nothing for this parcel: a gap is named, never filled with a guess.

How this land works

About 3,703 mm of rain falls here in a year. 82% of the parcel is under tree cover, and the ground slopes 9.7° on average, enough to move water without tearing soil where roots hold it. 8 mapped watercourses cross the land (Río Macho, Río Negro). The nearest road is 1.6 km off, which is the pressure the edge lives with. By 2050 the models expect +1.6 °C and -6% rain, so every flow above runs a little differently than it does today.

Regenerating — almost no tree cover lost since 2000; rainfall up 18% over twenty years.

To help: keep the canopy whole; the loop is running the right way on its own.

The score is the footnote. What matters is the pattern above it: what arrives, what the ground does with it, what leaves, and which way that is moving.

This place

52 hectares at San Isidro of rolling land around 2,410 m. The ground reads 82% under canopy. Water shapes it — 3,703 mm of rain a year, 8 traced watercourses. It stands inside the Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central–Talamanca connectivity network (screening extent — confirm against SINAC, the national conservation agency).

Its vocationprotect

Protect the keystone; hold the connection open. With 82% tree cover inside a declared biological corridor and a conservation priority of 89, the leverage here is protection: secure the core so the connection it anchors stays open.

2,410 m elevation82% forest9.7° slope3,703 mm rain/yrKeystone tier — secure now

Its trajectoryholding— the canopy record shows no meaningful loss in a generation.

This is an outsider's reading, assembled from instruments and public records. It is where understanding begins, not where it ends — the land, its neighbours, and the people who know it hold the rest.

The threads

Where the readings connect. Each thread follows one chain of cause and consequence across the instruments, and ends in what it means for what you do.

Each line is tagged with how it is known: recorded, from the historical archive · observed, measured from satellite or map data · derived, reasoned from other readings on this page · official, from a public or state record · estimated, from a model, not a measurement · scientific, from a published study.

The forest here has held for a generation.

recordedThis canopy has held: 83% cover in 2000, 0.9% lost since, none of it recent.

What to doThe work here is keeping, not fixing — and the first walk should confirm the stand is as intact up close as it reads from orbit.

Bears on the land's living value · high confidence

More water is arriving — and arriving harder.

observedThe twenty-year rain record moved +17.9% — this is a place whose water is changing, not holding.
observedOn 9.7° average slope, pulsed rain becomes runoff energy — erosion and flash flow, not just supply.
derivedNote the disagreement: the observed archive moved +17.9%, while the 2050 model says -6%. Neither cancels the other — the archive is what happened, the model is one projection. Design for the envelope: drainage for the wet record, storage for the dry projection.

What to doKeep or restore cover on the slopes and size drainage for pulses, not averages; verify culverts and crossings in the wet season.

Bears on this land and the people downstream · medium confidence

Abundant water is also a legal shape on this land.

observed8 watercourses are traced on and around this parcel.
officialCosta Rica's Ley Forestal 7575 (art. 33) protects riparian strips — roughly 10–15 m along rivers in rural land, up to 50 m on steep banks and around springs.
derivedMultiply the strips by the watercourses and a material share of the parcel is likely untouchable by law — which is a constraint for building and a gift for conservation.

What to doMap the statutory buffer zones before pricing or siting anything — the buildable area is smaller than the deed.

Bears on how much of the land is actually usable · medium confidence

For its kind of land, its soil stands out.

derivedAgainst 93 readings of like land (Neotropic), this parcel's soil ranks in the top 4%.
derivedAn unusual strength is the thing to protect first — it is what its peers do not have.

What to doWhatever plan is made, it should be one that cannot spend this soil down.

Bears on what this land is, relative to its kind · medium confidence

Height is this land's climate insurance.

observedAt 2,410 m, today's mean sits at 13.7°C.
estimatedThe +1.6°C projected by 2050 arrives on that cool baseline — roughly 0 hot days a year here while lowland sites cross heat thresholds this parcel never reaches.
derivedAs the lowlands warm, land that stays temperate does double work: livable for people, refuge for species moving uphill.
scientificOne caveat travels with cloud-forest elevations: warming lifts the cloud base, and the moisture belt this forest lives in moves uphill with it — refuge for what arrives from below, displacement for what already depends on the mist.

What to doTreat elevation as an appreciating part of the asset — and design for the species arriving from below, not only the ones here now.

Bears on the decades ahead · medium confidence

The road that serves this land also exposes it.

observedA road passes 1.64 km from the parcel — access is cheap.
officialThe parcel does connectivity work inside Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central–Talamanca — and roads are where corridor edges fray first.
derivedWhatever makes this land easy for you makes it easy for extraction: the road is both your driveway and the pressure vector.

What to doControl the access early — gates, a present caretaker, and (in Costa Rica) enrolment in the PSA forest-protection payment turn the road back into an asset.

Bears on the boundary line · medium confidence

The loops that govern it

Regeneration is not a feature added to land; it is a loop changing direction. These are the ones the readings can see, which way each is running, and where a hand changes it.

Forest and water

canopy → cloud and rain held → streams and soil moisture → canopy

holding

82% tree cover on 3,703 mm of rain; 0.9% of the tree cover lost since 2000, last in 2020.

Keep the canopy whole; the loop is running the right way on its own.

The edge and the road

access → clearing at the edge → more edge → more access

holding

road 1.6 km; 0.9% tree cover lost since 2000.

Distance is doing the work here; keep it, and do not build the road that would end it.

Reading the place

This 52-hectare parcel near San Isidro, El Guarco, Cartago Province is ecologically strong land whose work is stewardship, not repair, scoring 80 out of 100. Its main strength is that the soil is rich in organic carbon, a strong base for farming and restoration. The first move: ground-truth what the canopy actually is before assuming forest value.

Opportunitymedium confidence

The soil is rich in organic carbon, a strong base for farming and restoration.

Carbon-rich soil holds water and nutrients well, supports higher yields and faster regrowth, and may qualify for soil-carbon programs.

103.4 g/kg soil organic carbon in the top 30 cm, loam texture, pH 5.1 (ISRIC SoilGrids).

Opportunitylow confidence

Most of the parcel reads as tree cover.

Tree cover can carry real conservation and carbon value, but satellite land-cover cannot tell natural forest from a monoculture plantation (oil palm, rubber, teak). Confirm which it is before assuming biodiversity or carbon value.

82% of the parcel reads as tree cover (satellite land-cover mapping). Naturalness is not verified.

Climatemedium confidence

Models project a warmer and drier climate here by 2050.

Expect a warmer and drier future here; favour species and infrastructure that tolerate the projected range.

Projected change by 2050: +1.6 °C mean temperature, -6% rainfall. Exposure rated Moderate.

Waterhigh confidence

Rainfall is very high.

Abundant water supports productive growth but raises the risk of flooding, waterlogging, and nutrient leaching, so drainage and slope matter. Rainfall has also been rising, which can bring more intense wet seasons; plan drainage accordingly.

3,703 mm of rain per year. Nearest mapped watercourse is about 4.51 km away. Up about 18% over 20 years.

Terrainhigh confidence

The parcel sits at high elevation.

Higher ground is cooler, which changes crop suitability and can ease heat stress, but may add access and frost considerations.

Mean elevation 2,410 m, mean slope 10°, 139 m of relief.

Biodiversitymedium confidence

Biodiversity records are moderate.

There is a reasonable but incomplete picture of local wildlife; a ground survey would sharpen any conservation or regulatory assessment.

222 biodiversity records nearby, including Chlorospingus pileatus and Panterpe insignis (GBIF, the global species-record archive).

Accesshigh confidence

The parcel is relatively remote.

Distance from roads and towns means lower encroachment pressure and more privacy, but higher transport and operating costs.

About 1.64 km to the nearest road.

Confidence reflects the data behind each reading: high when clear passes or strong sources agree, medium on a partial or single-source signal, low where the data is sparse or indirect. A low-confidence reading usually needs one more clear pass, or a check on the ground.

What the land is telling us

Read across the record, the land reads as stable: the canopy history shows no meaningful loss in a generation and the water signal is holding, which means the work is to build on a sound base rather than to reverse a decline.

Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot.

Taken together, this is ecologically strong land whose work is stewardship, not repair. Its clearest strength to build from is that the soil is rich in organic carbon, a strong base for farming and restoration.

Where the capital goes · corridor & deployment

89Conservation priority

KeystoneCore habitat

High-value corridor land to secure before it is lost.

high-value connectivity land to secure now

Two lenses, two numbers: the Land Score reads this land's own body; conservation priority reads its position in the network. When they disagree, the gap itself is the finding.

Within the Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central–Talamanca (screening) · Área de Conservación Central / La Amistad-Pacífico (ACC / ACLAP)

Inside the Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central–Talamanca, this reads as intact habitat to secure, scoring 89 out of 100 for conservation priority. It is a keystone: high-value connectivity land to secure now, before it turns over. A small, low-footprint operation (fit 77/100) could fund the work from the already-worked ground.

77/100

Hospitality fit

The funding layer: a small, low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground, sized to carry the restoration — never spending the habitat it depends on.

Corridormedium confidence

The parcel falls within the Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central–Talamanca (screening).

This is a declared biological corridor in Área de Conservación Central / La Amistad-Pacífico (ACC / ACLAP) — land inside it carries a national connectivity mandate and is where conservation capital compounds, joining protected areas rather than standing alone. The corridor links Parque Nacional Braulio Carrillo, Volcán Irazú / Turrialba, Parque Internacional La Amistad.

Centroid inside the PNCB screening extent for this corridor. Extent is approximate — confirm the parcel against the official SINAC/PNCB record.

Conservationmedium confidence

This reads as intact habitat — the priority is to secure it, not rebuild it.

Standing natural forest is far cheaper to protect than to restore, and holding it inside a corridor keeps the connection open. Securing tenure and legal protection is where capital does the most here.

82% tree cover.

Hospitalitymedium confidence

A small hospitality operation could carry the conservation here.

In the regenerative model the lodging is a means, not the end: a low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that funds the restoration and stewardship, while the core is left to recover. Kept small, it also gives the corridor local guardians with a reason to hold it.

Hospitality fit 77/100, drawing on standing forest, protected land alongside. Site any building on the already-worked ground, not the habitat.

Capital moves

01
Secure this land first — through purchase, or a conservation easement that survives a change of owner.
Before committing
Intact corridor habitat holds its value only while it stays intact; locking in protection before the land turns over is the move capital cannot undo.
Confirm on the ground · Confirm title and boundaries with a local lawyer, then scope a servidumbre ecológica (ecological easement) and FONAFIFO's PSA forest-protection payment (Pago por Servicios Ambientales — Costa Rica's national payment for keeping forest standing) against the parcel.
02
Protect the standing forest and remove the active threats to it.
First visit
The habitat is already here; the work is to keep it — stopping clearing, fire, and hunting pressure holds far more value than any planting would add.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the boundary for signs of encroachment, fire, and hunting; agree the protection terms with neighbours who share the edge.
03
Site a small, low-footprint hospitality operation on the already-worked ground to fund the stewardship.
Once the land is secured
A modest operation on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that pays for the restoration and the guardians, without spending the habitat it depends on.
Confirm on the ground · Model the operation at a size the land can carry, keep it off the habitat, and check the Certificado de Sostenibilidad Turística (CST) and local zoning before designing anything.
04
Set a connectivity baseline and re-read it — camera traps aimed at the movement the corridor was declared to carry.
Ongoing
Funders and partners judge a corridor by whether wildlife actually moves through it; a repeatable baseline is what turns the thesis into evidence and steers the next round of capital.
Confirm on the ground · Run camera traps and species counts on a fixed schedule, aimed at the connectivity this corridor was declared for — one of the country's oldest corridors, bridging the Central Volcanic Cordillera to the Talamanca massif.

The deployment reading is a screening lens layered on the Land Score — it points capital at the land where it builds the most connectivity, and each move is paired with the ground-truth step that confirms it. Corridor extents are approximate PNCB screening footprints; confirm a parcel against the official SINAC/PNCB record.

How it compares

95thpercentile · Neotropic

Ranked against 93 readings · same region

95th percentile against all 100 readings so far — the cohort rank above is the fairer one; this is the wider one.

Stronger land than 95% of the 93 readings logged in Neotropic. Soil is its strongest signal here (96th percentile), water its weakest (49th). Rainfall is declining across the landscape to the north-west.

Percentile by reading · higher is better land

Water

49th

Soil

96th

Ecology

59th

Climate

70th

Low pressure

74th

Landscape · 14 readings within 44 km

·Rainfall is declining across the landscape to the north-west
·Land reads weaker toward the north-west

Percentiles compare this reading against the growing corpus of public TERRA readings in like land — not all land on Earth. They sharpen as the wall grows.

The physical frame

Climate, water, soil, and shape — what the land is made of and what moves across it.

Climate · to 2050

Annual rainfall, 2004–2024 · mm

13.7°C

Mean temp

+1.6°C

2050 Δ temp

-6%

2050 Δ rain

Exposure · Moderate

2050 sits within a single planning horizon — about 24 years out. The models expect seasons here about 1.6°C warmer than today's, with 6% less rain. Expect is the honest verb: this is the middle of a range of futures, not a certainty — so design to the range, not to today.

Water

3,703mm/yr

Rainfall

+17.9%

20-yr trend

4.5km

To watercourse

Río Macho · Río Negro · Quebrada Palanca · Río Blanco

Soil · 0–30 cm

103.4g/kg

Org. carbon

5.1

32%

Sand

24%

Clay

Loam

Terrain & cover

2,410m

Elevation

9.7°

Mean slope

82%

Forest

Built

Tree cover 82%Grassland 17%Built-up 1%

The living surface

What grows here, what is being lost, and what presses on it.

Ecology

222

Recorded wildlife observations

GBIF · the global species-record archive

Chlorospingus pileatus · Panterpe insignis · Empidonax atriceps · Turdus plebejus

Pressure

1.6km

To road

—km

To settlement

Forest history · since 2000

83%

Tree cover 2000

0.9%

Cover lost

2020

Latest loss

Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2023-v1.11

Record & context

What the state and its institutions say about this ground.

Costa Rica ecological corridor

Within

Corridor

screening extent

Área de Conservación Central / La Amistad-Pacífico (ACC / ACLAP)

Conservation area

Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central–Talamanca

One of the country's oldest corridors, bridging the Central Volcanic Cordillera to the Talamanca massif.

Connects · Parque Nacional Braulio Carrillo · Volcán Irazú / Turrialba · Parque Internacional La Amistad

PNCB / SINAC — Corredores Biológicos (screening reference) · approximate screening extent — confirm against the official SINAC / PNCB record

See the corridor network →

Best-fit regenerative model

Corridor anchor reserve

88 / 100 fit

Protect the keystone; hold the connection open.

With 82% tree cover inside a declared biological corridor and a conservation priority of 89, the leverage here is protection: secure the core so the connection it anchors stays open.

High-value habitat inside the connectivity network. The move is to secure it — purchase or easement — so the corridor it anchors stays unbroken.

2,410 m elevation82% forest9.7° slope3,703 mm rain/yrinside a corridor

Also consider · Upper-watershed research station (79) · Ecolodge / retreat (64)

A published, rules-based suggestion read from the parcel's own indicators — forest, water, slope, access, and its place in the network. It names the shape of project the land is already set up to carry; confirm it against tenure, soils, and what you know from the ground. These fit numbers rank whole project models against each other; the deployment lens's hospitality fit (77/100) is a different scale that asks only whether a small lodge could fund the stewardship here — the two need not match.

What to do

01
Ground-truth what the canopy actually is before assuming forest value.
First visit
Satellite land-cover cannot separate natural forest from a monoculture plantation, and the difference decides the conservation and carbon value.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the stand: one species in rows is plantation; mixed ages and species with natural regeneration is forest. A botanist can confirm.
02
Confirm tenure and boundaries against the legal record before relying on this reading.
Before committing
The satellite record cannot see title, easements, or where the legal boundary actually runs — the things that govern what you can do here.
Confirm on the ground · Pull the title and cadastral record, and walk the boundary against it on the ground.
03
Visit the land to confirm the reading and protect what already works.
First visit
The core systems read as sound; the priority is to keep them that way and avoid degrading them.
Confirm on the ground · Walk the parcel with the reading in hand and note where the ground agrees and disagrees with it.

Questions to sit with

Standing under the canopy, is it one species or many — and which parts would you protect rather than replant?
The soil is a real asset here — what use would build it further rather than spend it down?
Are you here to hold this land as it is, to work it, or to help it change — and does the reading above serve that intention?
If the work succeeds, what do the water, the canopy, and the people around this land look like a generation from now — and what is the first condition that has to change for that to begin?
Where does this reading disagree with what you have seen walking the land? That disagreement is the first thing to check on the ground.

These are not data gaps — they are the questions the data cannot answer.

Ask the analyst

Answers are grounded in this parcel's reading and tagged by basis — observed is measured, derived is reasoned from measurements, estimated is model-based, and unknown is said plainly. The conversation stays in your browser.

Reading this land to

Talk it through with us

This reading is built from satellite and open data. It cannot see soil biology, legal tenure, or what you already know from walking the land — a 30-minute call tests the reading against the ground and sequences the work. No cost, no obligation.

Schedule a 30-min call →See services or email us

Sources & method · 9 layers→

Water, roads & protected areas — OpenStreetMap

Overpass (waterways, highways, places, protected areas)

vector · live

ODbL 1.0

Biodiversity — GBIF

Occurrence records (count + top species)

point · live

Mixed CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-NC (per dataset)

Place — OpenStreetMap / Nominatim

Nominatim reverse geocode

settlement · live

ODbL 1.0

Terrain — AWS Terrarium (Mapzen)

Terrarium elevation tiles

~10 m (z12) · 2017

Open (attribution)

Climate — Open-Meteo

Archive 2004–2024 + MPI-ESM1-2-XR to 2050

~9 km · 2004–2024 / 2045–2049

CC-BY 4.0 (data); non-commercial API tier

Soil — ISRIC SoilGrids v2

SoilGrids v2.0 (SOC, pH, sand, clay; 0–30 cm)

250 m · 2020

CC-BY 4.0

Land cover — ESA WorldCover

WorldCover 2021 v200

10 m · 2021

CC-BY 4.0 (commercial promotion: notify due@esa.int)

Surface water — JRC Global Surface Water

Global Surface Water v1.4 — occurrence & seasonality

30 m · 1984–2021

Copernicus / open (attribution)

Forest loss — Hansen Global Forest Change

Global Forest Change (tree cover 2000 + annual loss)

~30 m · 2000–2023

CC-BY 4.0

Every number above is public, open data — named, dated, and licensed. What TERRA does not publish is the lens: the weights, curves, and verdict thresholds that turn these layers into a Land Score. That judgment is calibrated from land walked on the ground, and it stays proprietary.

Unavailable for this parcel: Sentinel-2, the radar, the national registry, the governance record, the thermal read — the affected pillars were reweighted, not guessed.

Generated Fri, 03 Jul 2026 22:44:04 GMT · 4.0s · synthesized by TERRA.